CVE-2022-26939 - Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

Severity

70%

Complexity

10%

Confidentiality

98%

Storage Spaces Direct Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2022-26932, CVE-2022-26938.

CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7. CVSS Attack Vector: local. CVSS Attack Complexity: high. CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

CVSS 2.0 Base Score 4.4. CVSS Attack Vector: local. CVSS Attack Complexity: medium. CVSS Vector: (AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P).

Demo Examples

Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

CWE-362

This code could be used in an e-commerce application that supports transfers between accounts. It takes the total amount of the transfer, sends it to the new account, and deducts the amount from the original account.


               
NotifyUser("New balance: $newbalance");
FatalError("Bad Transfer Amount");
FatalError("Insufficient Funds");

A race condition could occur between the calls to GetBalanceFromDatabase() and SendNewBalanceToDatabase().

Suppose the balance is initially 100.00. An attack could be constructed as follows:


               
PROGRAM-2 sends a request to update the database, setting the balance to 99.00

At this stage, the attacker should have a balance of 19.00 (due to 81.00 worth of transfers), but the balance is 99.00, as recorded in the database.

To prevent this weakness, the programmer has several options, including using a lock to prevent multiple simultaneous requests to the web application, or using a synchronization mechanism that includes all the code between GetBalanceFromDatabase() and SendNewBalanceToDatabase().

Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

CWE-362

The following function attempts to acquire a lock in order to perform operations on a shared resource.


               
}
pthread_mutex_unlock(mutex);/* access shared resource */

However, the code does not check the value returned by pthread_mutex_lock() for errors. If pthread_mutex_lock() cannot acquire the mutex for any reason, the function may introduce a race condition into the program and result in undefined behavior.

In order to avoid data races, correctly written programs must check the result of thread synchronization functions and appropriately handle all errors, either by attempting to recover from them or reporting it to higher levels.


               
}
return pthread_mutex_unlock(mutex);
return result;
/* access shared resource */

Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

CWE-362

Suppose a processor's Memory Management Unit (MMU) has 5 other shadow MMUs to distribute its workload for its various cores. Each MMU has the start address and end address of "accessible" memory. Any time this accessible range changes (as per the processor's boot status), the main MMU sends an update message to all the shadow MMUs.

Suppose the interconnect fabric does not prioritize such "update" packets over other general traffic packets. This introduces a race condition. If an attacker can flood the target with enough messages so that some of those attack packets reach the target before the new access ranges gets updated, then the attacker can leverage this scenario.

Demo Examples

Improper Privilege Management

CWE-269

This code temporarily raises the program's privileges to allow creation of a new user folder.


               
return True
return False#avoid CWE-22 and CWE-78
lowerPrivileges()
return False

While the program only raises its privilege level to create the folder and immediately lowers it again, if the call to os.mkdir() throws an exception, the call to lowerPrivileges() will not occur. As a result, the program is indefinitely operating in a raised privilege state, possibly allowing further exploitation to occur.

Improper Privilege Management

CWE-269

Evidence of privilege change:


               
seteuid(getuid());/* do some stuff */

               
}
// privileged code goes here, for example:// nothing to return

Improper Privilege Management

CWE-269

This code intends to allow only Administrators to print debug information about a system.


               
}
ADMIN,USER,GUEST
}
}
break;
break;
System.out.println("You must be logged in to perform this command");

While the intention was to only allow Administrators to print the debug information, the code as written only excludes those the with the role of "GUEST". Someone with the role of "ADMIN" or "USER" will be allowed access, which goes against the original intent. An attacker may be able to use this debug information to craft an attack on the system.

Improper Privilege Management

CWE-269

This code allows someone with the role of "ADMIN" or "OPERATOR" to reset a user's password. The role of "OPERATOR" is intended to have less privileges than an "ADMIN", but still be able to help users with small issues such as forgotten passwords.


               
}
ADMIN,OPERATOR,USER,GUEST
}
}
}
break;
break;
break;
System.out.println("You must be logged in to perform this command");

This code does not check the role of the user whose password is being reset. It is possible for an Operator to gain Admin privileges by resetting the password of an Admin account and taking control of that account.

Overview

Type

Microsoft Windows Server

First reported 2 years ago

2022-05-10 21:15:00

Last updated 2 years ago

2022-05-23 17:29:00

Affected Software

Microsoft Windows Server 2016

Microsoft Windows Server 2019

Stay updated

ExploitPedia is constantly evolving. Sign up to receive a notification when we release additional functionality.

Get in touch

If you'd like to report a bug or have any suggestions for improvements then please do get in touch with us using this form. We will get back to you as soon as we can.