55%
18%
60%
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/hns: Fix spin_unlock_irqrestore() called with IRQs enabled Fix missuse of spin_lock_irq()/spin_unlock_irq() when spin_lock_irqsave()/spin_lock_irqrestore() was hold. This was discovered through the lock debugging, and the corresponding log is as follows: raw_local_irq_restore() called with IRQs enabled WARNING: CPU: 96 PID: 2074 at kernel/locking/irqflag-debug.c:10 warn_bogus_irq_restore+0x30/0x40 ... Call trace: warn_bogus_irq_restore+0x30/0x40 _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x84/0xc8 add_qp_to_list+0x11c/0x148 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_create_qp_common.constprop.0+0x240/0x780 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_create_qp+0x98/0x160 [hns_roce_hw_v2] create_qp+0x138/0x258 ib_create_qp_kernel+0x50/0xe8 create_mad_qp+0xa8/0x128 ib_mad_port_open+0x218/0x448 ib_mad_init_device+0x70/0x1f8 add_client_context+0xfc/0x220 enable_device_and_get+0xd0/0x140 ib_register_device.part.0+0xf4/0x1c8 ib_register_device+0x34/0x50 hns_roce_register_device+0x174/0x3d0 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_init+0xfc/0x2c0 [hns_roce_hw_v2] __hns_roce_hw_v2_init_instance+0x7c/0x1d0 [hns_roce_hw_v2] hns_roce_hw_v2_init_instance+0x9c/0x180 [hns_roce_hw_v2]
CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.5. CVSS Attack Vector: local. CVSS Attack Complexity: low. CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
In the following Java snippet, methods are defined to get and set a long field in an instance of a class that is shared across multiple threads. Because operations on double and long are nonatomic in Java, concurrent access may cause unexpected behavior. Thus, all operations on long and double fields should be synchronized.
}return someLongValue;someLongValue = l;This code tries to obtain a lock for a file, then writes to it.
fclose($logFile);}//attempt to get logfile lockflock($logfile, LOCK_UN);// unlock logfileprint "Could not obtain lock on logFile.log, message not recorded\n";PHP by default will wait indefinitely until a file lock is released. If an attacker is able to obtain the file lock, this code will pause execution, possibly leading to denial of service for other users. Note that in this case, if an attacker can perform an flock() on the file, they may already have privileges to destroy the log file. However, this still impacts the execution of other programs that depend on flock().
The following function attempts to acquire a lock in order to perform operations on a shared resource.
}
pthread_mutex_unlock(mutex);/* access shared resource */However, the code does not check the value returned by pthread_mutex_lock() for errors. If pthread_mutex_lock() cannot acquire the mutex for any reason the function may introduce a race condition into the program and result in undefined behavior.
In order to avoid data races correctly written programs must check the result of thread synchronization functions and appropriately handle all errors, either by attempting to recover from them or reporting it to higher levels.
}
return pthread_mutex_unlock(mutex);return result;/* access shared resource */It may seem that the following bit of code achieves thread safety while avoiding unnecessary synchronization...
return helper;
}}helper = new Helper();The programmer wants to guarantee that only one Helper() object is ever allocated, but does not want to pay the cost of synchronization every time this code is called.
Suppose that helper is not initialized. Then, thread A sees that helper==null and enters the synchronized block and begins to execute:
helper = new Helper();If a second thread, thread B, takes over in the middle of this call and helper has not finished running the constructor, then thread B may make calls on helper while its fields hold incorrect values.
ExploitPedia is constantly evolving. Sign up to receive a notification when we release additional functionality.
If you'd like to report a bug or have any suggestions for improvements then please do get in touch with us using this form. We will get back to you as soon as we can.