70%
10%
98%
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: shmem: fix data-race in shmem_getattr() I got the following KCSAN report during syzbot testing: ================================================================== BUG: KCSAN: data-race in generic_fillattr / inode_set_ctime_current write to 0xffff888102eb3260 of 4 bytes by task 6565 on cpu 1: inode_set_ctime_to_ts include/linux/fs.h:1638 [inline] inode_set_ctime_current+0x169/0x1d0 fs/inode.c:2626 shmem_mknod+0x117/0x180 mm/shmem.c:3443 shmem_create+0x34/0x40 mm/shmem.c:3497 lookup_open fs/namei.c:3578 [inline] open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3647 [inline] path_openat+0xdbc/0x1f00 fs/namei.c:3883 do_filp_open+0xf7/0x200 fs/namei.c:3913 do_sys_openat2+0xab/0x120 fs/open.c:1416 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1431 [inline] __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1447 [inline] __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1442 [inline] __x64_sys_openat+0xf3/0x120 fs/open.c:1442 x64_sys_call+0x1025/0x2d60 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:258 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x54/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e read to 0xffff888102eb3260 of 4 bytes by task 3498 on cpu 0: inode_get_ctime_nsec include/linux/fs.h:1623 [inline] inode_get_ctime include/linux/fs.h:1629 [inline] generic_fillattr+0x1dd/0x2f0 fs/stat.c:62 shmem_getattr+0x17b/0x200 mm/shmem.c:1157 vfs_getattr_nosec fs/stat.c:166 [inline] vfs_getattr+0x19b/0x1e0 fs/stat.c:207 vfs_statx_path fs/stat.c:251 [inline] vfs_statx+0x134/0x2f0 fs/stat.c:315 vfs_fstatat+0xec/0x110 fs/stat.c:341 __do_sys_newfstatat fs/stat.c:505 [inline] __se_sys_newfstatat+0x58/0x260 fs/stat.c:499 __x64_sys_newfstatat+0x55/0x70 fs/stat.c:499 x64_sys_call+0x141f/0x2d60 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:263 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x54/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e value changed: 0x2755ae53 -> 0x27ee44d3 Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 3498 Comm: udevd Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00326-gd1f2d51b711a-dirty #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024 ================================================================== When calling generic_fillattr(), if you don't hold read lock, data-race will occur in inode member variables, which can cause unexpected behavior. Since there is no special protection when shmem_getattr() calls generic_fillattr(), data-race occurs by functions such as shmem_unlink() or shmem_mknod(). This can cause unexpected results, so commenting it out is not enough. Therefore, when calling generic_fillattr() from shmem_getattr(), it is appropriate to protect the inode using inode_lock_shared() and inode_unlock_shared() to prevent data-race.
Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.
CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7. CVSS Attack Vector: local. CVSS Attack Complexity: high. CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
This code could be used in an e-commerce application that supports transfers between accounts. It takes the total amount of the transfer, sends it to the new account, and deducts the amount from the original account.
NotifyUser("New balance: $newbalance");FatalError("Bad Transfer Amount");FatalError("Insufficient Funds");A race condition could occur between the calls to GetBalanceFromDatabase() and SendNewBalanceToDatabase().
Suppose the balance is initially 100.00. An attack could be constructed as follows:
PROGRAM-2 sends a request to update the database, setting the balance to 99.00At this stage, the attacker should have a balance of 19.00 (due to 81.00 worth of transfers), but the balance is 99.00, as recorded in the database.
To prevent this weakness, the programmer has several options, including using a lock to prevent multiple simultaneous requests to the web application, or using a synchronization mechanism that includes all the code between GetBalanceFromDatabase() and SendNewBalanceToDatabase().
The following function attempts to acquire a lock in order to perform operations on a shared resource.
}
pthread_mutex_unlock(mutex);/* access shared resource */However, the code does not check the value returned by pthread_mutex_lock() for errors. If pthread_mutex_lock() cannot acquire the mutex for any reason, the function may introduce a race condition into the program and result in undefined behavior.
In order to avoid data races, correctly written programs must check the result of thread synchronization functions and appropriately handle all errors, either by attempting to recover from them or reporting it to higher levels.
}
return pthread_mutex_unlock(mutex);return result;/* access shared resource */Suppose a processor's Memory Management Unit (MMU) has 5 other shadow MMUs to distribute its workload for its various cores. Each MMU has the start address and end address of "accessible" memory. Any time this accessible range changes (as per the processor's boot status), the main MMU sends an update message to all the shadow MMUs.
Suppose the interconnect fabric does not prioritize such "update" packets over other general traffic packets. This introduces a race condition. If an attacker can flood the target with enough messages so that some of those attack packets reach the target before the new access ranges gets updated, then the attacker can leverage this scenario.
ExploitPedia is constantly evolving. Sign up to receive a notification when we release additional functionality.
If you'd like to report a bug or have any suggestions for improvements then please do get in touch with us using this form. We will get back to you as soon as we can.